Read Time:
2-3 Mins

A Pharmaceutical Company's Journey to YoY Hiring Success with a Unified Platform

By
CBREX

A global pharmaceutical company aimed to digitize its recruitment process to support its ambitious growth plans, but it faced several familiar hiring challenges. A successful partnership with a new platform paved the way for some resounding results.

Challenge 01: Vendor Management Friction

The company was manually managing a network of over 20–30 vendors, a process that was time-consuming and inefficient. This decentralized approach made it difficult to maintain consistent vendor curation and communication, often leading to a “long tail of low-performing agencies.”

Solution 01: A Centralized Communication Hub
By using a built-in communication tool, the company achieved improved results, spending 7x less time on vendor management. This centralized communication hub organized and controlled the influx of calls and emails, allowing recruiters to respond on their preferred schedule and make more confident hiring decisions. A single platform eliminates the need to use multiple channels like emails and phone calls for communication with vendors.

Challenge 02: Sourcing in Tough-to-Hire Regions

The pandemic shrank the candidate pool for on-site roles like machine operators, QA/QC, and R&D in tough-to-hire regions. These hard-to-fill roles often led to longer turnaround times and higher recruitment costs.

For this company, locations such as Fall River, MA; Central Islip, NY; and Hauppauge, NY posed particularly tough sourcing challenges. The positions they needed to fill spanned across critical areas of pharmaceutical operations, including:

  • QA/QC, Quality Assurance, Analytical QA Associate, and QA Inspector
  • QC Glass Cleaning Technician, QC Lab Tech
  • Manufacturing Operator (FBD, Encapsulation, Coating), Packaging Operator
  • Warehouse Operator, Facilities Maintenance Engineer
  • Senior Accountant

These roles, spread across technical, operational, and support functions, required a broad spectrum of specialized skills—making traditional hiring methods even more complex.

Solution 02: An AI-Powered Matching Engine
By leveraging a platform with an AI-matching engine, specialist vendors were automatically mapped to open roles, leading to a 58% job-fill ratio. The platform acted as a “one-stop-shop” for posting positions across all levels and skills. This curated network of specialist agencies, combined with a multi-level screening process, ensured that only qualified candidates were presented.

Challenge 03: Skyrocketing Hiring Costs

Hiring costs, particularly for executive search roles, posed a significant challenge. Without a unified view of vendor performance, it was easy to pay high fees for low-quality candidates.

Solution 03: Bottom-Line Savings
The partnership helped the company reduce vendor costs by 31%, resulting in significant bottom-line savings. Vendor consolidation helped optimize recruitment spending within an automated system, providing more granular control over costs. It also enabled more favorable rate negotiations and improved operational efficiency.

The Outcome

Today, a significant share of the company’s vendor hiring in North America is managed through the platform’s VMS, setting the stage for a global VMS model. From QA/QC specialists in Fall River, MA to manufacturing and packaging operators in Central Islip, NY, and analytical QA associates in Hauppauge, NY, the platform has proven to be a reliable partner in filling both volume and niche positions.

By digitizing recruitment across diverse job categories—from lab technicians to accountants—the company was able to improve hiring speed, cut costs, and ensure consistency in quality. This unified hiring approach now enables the company to staff even its toughest roles with confidence and efficiency, laying the groundwork for scalable global growth.

Table of contents

Sign up for regular updates
Get all the news delivered to your inbox.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Similar blogs

Read Time :
Zinnov-Nasscom GCC Report 2026: What 2,117 GCCs Mean for Hiring
Zinnov-Nasscom's 2026 GCC report shows 2,117 centres competing for scarce AI, cloud and data talent in India. Here's what it means for your hiring plan.
Read Time :
72% of Employers Can't Fill Roles: Reading the 2026 Talent Shortage Survey
72% of employers can't fill roles in 2026, per ManpowerGroup. See why AI skills lead the gap and how India-HQ firms should respond to the talent shortage.
Read Time :
Proposed $103,265 H-1B Fee: How Indian Companies Can Still Staff US Roles
DHS has proposed a $103,265 fee per cap-subject H-1B petition, up from roughly $2,000-10,000 today, and Indian companies staffing US roles are rethinking sponsorship. This piece for India-HQ mid-market and dual-HQ companies compares the cost of sponsoring versus hiring US-based residents through specialist agencies. CBREX brings first-hand experience: 6,500+ global hires across 55 countries, paying agencies only when a hire is made. Key points: The proposed $103,265 H-1B fee and timeline; Cost comparison: sponsorship versus local US hiring; How specialist US agencies source local candidates; Pay-on-hire model via CBREX's single contract